Volunteers with Key Skills

19th August 2009 13:49 | by Eric Priezkalns

I recently saw the bio-pic 'Che' where Benicio Del Toro plays revolutionary Ernesto 'Che' Guevara. Putting military metaphors aside, what struck home was that any mass movement needs more than volunteers and enthusiasm to succeed. It also needs organization and resources. In fact, it needs the right organization and the right resources. In the film, Guevara is presented as more than just a passionate idealist. He is also a talented organizer. In one scene, Guevara berates a junior officer for not scheduling the relief for a watch, hence leaving two soldiers on guard all night long. In another scene, Guevara interviews a new recruit, and having judged how to use her talents, he gives her the important job of making collections from nearby farmers. Several times in the movie, we see Guevara talking to his troops about the importance of learning to read and write, so they have the skills they need to tell fact from fiction and can learn to do more than shooting guns and carrying equipment. We can be thankful we still live in a democratic society, and that our struggle will be fought with words and not bullets. Even so, we need the same approach of being disciplined and organized, because we face hostility and entrenched opposition to our goals.

Our opponents will not give in easily. They are organized and they have tremendous resources at their disposal. That much is obvious. Just the other day we had the news story of Peter Mandelson dining with David Geffen at the Rothschild's villa in Corfu. We are challenging the interests of people with enormous wealth and power. They will not allow their wealth and power to be diminished without a tenacious fight. To defeat them, we pirates need to be as organized as Guevara's guerrillas. That means recognizing where we have jobs that need doing, even if they are not glamorous. It also means recognizing where we have gaps in the skills we need, and doing something to close those gaps.

To begin with, we need to identify supporters that have crucial skills and are willing to help us do specialist jobs for the party. To do this, we intend to set up ‘expert’ groups within the party. Each group will be a pool of volunteers with special qualifications or experience that the party needs. Membership of a group will be limited to individuals with relevant qualifications. To help set up the groups, I am initially looking for a coordinator for each group. If you have the relevant background, and would like to volunteer to be coordinator for one of the groups, please contact me. The expert groups we are looking to form are:

  1. A Lawyers’ Expert Group to assist with legal obligations of running the party and interpreting legal implications of proposed reforms;
  2. An Accountants’ Expert Group to assist with implementation and execution of robust financial controls within the party;
  3. An Economists’ Expert Group to assist with interpreting economic implications of proposed reforms; and
  4. A Journalists and Media Expert Group to assist with presenting the party message in a way that is accessible and attractive to the media.

If you are willing to volunteer to coordinate and recruit members to one of these groups, please let me know. You can contact me at treasurer@pirateparty.org.uk.


10 comments


20th August 2009 07:40 by Trakgalvis
This is a great idea. How will these groups interact with the rest of us? Good communication is also important. Will group 4 include the presenters we need to appear on TV and radio? At some stage it would be worthwhile to arrange some professional training for these people, unless we already have someone like Barack Obama.
20th August 2009 12:19 by Eric Priezkalns
Because we are growing at speed, I'm not going to set expectations for how these groups organize or interact with the rest of the party. Better to give the volunteers in these groups the freedom to organize themselves and we can learn and change things as we go along. The priority right now is to identify 'go-to' groups who can be trusted to handle important and specialist jobs. Their remit will grow naturally and will depend on the number of volunteers who join each group. We don't have the funds to pay for professional training, so any media training would need to be provided by volunteers already in the Journalists and Media Expert Group. I will leave it to the volunteers who join the group to decide if that is something they are willing and able to offer.
21st August 2009 08:53 by WilliamFS
Just beware, not to produce too many unnecessary hierarchies. Other parties are already using the rethorics of crowdsourcing, we are supposed to be the party showing how that is done. For skills like law and accounting, fair enough, there should be experts dedicated, no argument there. But let us not go too far down the expert route untill all that is left to members in general is distributing leaflets. To be involved with this party should not be just like being involved with others. There should be a greater sense of involvement - this should be part of our appeal.
21st August 2009 14:23 by Eric Priezkalns
I'm not trying to create hierarchies. Quite the opposite. I just want quick solutions to important problems. So if we need someone to cast an expert eye over a contract, let's ask a lawyer who is also a supporter of the party. Or if we need someone to help do the books, let's involve someone who has some experience. It's tempting to say we could train people, but that doesn't answer who is going to give the training in the first place. But this is not the start of creating lots of unnecessary hierarchies. For one thing, we wouldn't have time to manage a lot of hierarchies.
21st August 2009 08:55 by WilliamFS
For instance, given the current situation of the party, rather than wait for "headquarters" (whatever that is) to sort something out completely and risk missing an opportunity, I think we should be discussing and agreeing on parameters within which to work during freshers week (such as which promotional materials to use). Many people are enthousiastic and willing to promote the party. Freshers week is an important opportunity to find a big concentration of our main demographics who are not yet busy with their studies and open to new ideas. If we are not able to coordinate them all "from above", we should just give them some guidelines and let them coordinate themselves within those guidelines. Rather that than waste the opportunity.
21st August 2009 14:26 by Eric Priezkalns
William, take the lead on this. To get the ball rolling, I suggest you write the first draft of the guidelines for student groups, as you obviously have some ideas of what should go in it. Then you can offer it up to other members and take their input, then finalize the draft.
21st August 2009 08:57 by WilliamFS
PS - On a related issue, how come some people intervene on forum discussions using their blog entries? It is not even clear to me who gets to write in the blog and why. I would like to think that the only people who have blogs are these: Andrew Robinson, Philip Hunt, Eric Priezkalns, John McKeown, Miah Gregory - for they have been elected. Is that the case?
21st August 2009 09:49 by Andrew Robinson
Blog entries are not interventions on forum discussions, they are a way of raising the profile of our internal forum discussions, and turning them into public discussions. Currently, there are 5 people who can post blogs, the four officers you mentioned as well as Gavin who heads the web team. He will be posting on site issues such as downtime and upgrades, not politics.
21st August 2009 09:03 by Trakgalvis
Can I join the "Journalists and Media Expert Group", or press gang, as I think it should be called?
26th August 2009 09:01 by VishalVashisht
You should look at regional groups, rather than party structure, not too hippy, right on, lets all sing and have a vote because then nothing would get done. Something where you have a national "leadership" but on the ground the groups are more of a mish mash. The leadership puts out the ideas and the direction and the people on the ground take on those ideas in their own ways and their own directions. What might be right for a progressive group in London might be totally wrong for someone in York or Edinburgh. As long as the moral, idealistic, directions are the same, how each group gets there isnt important. This also makes people regionally feel AND HAVE greater input into the decisions and feel and BE more impowered than in a traditional party structure
Posting new comments has been disabled for this post.