paliwoda wrote:Why does Scotland need a manifesto for the 2011 Holyrood Elections?
Why run in the elections with the banner Pirate Party Scotland?
glambert wrote:I'm happy to let things pan out and see where we end up.
However I don't see myself as being out of order when asking for a membership vote on certain issues, as that's how we've decided on everything we've done so far, not just a group of members doing as they see fit. If there isn't to be a vote on anything, then I wish you the best of luck and will do what I can to help out from afar.
I must take issue with the sentiment that I'm anti-scottish. Over half of my family are Scottish, I'm probably the least anti-Scottish Englishman alive today, I just fail to understand why Scottish people are so, frankly, idiotic, that by Finlay's words would deem a UK party to be Conservative or racist. That's just stupid.
borgs8472 wrote:"Pirate Party" isn't any kind of political entity is why, it's an administrative and inter party communication body. Hence you can't actually vote for the Pirate party, just like you can't vote for Communism, Liberalism etc. I think.
rancidpunk wrote:Am I alone in being only interested in what needs to be done to help pirates win elections wherever they are geographically located?
andrewtindall wrote:PPS *is* an officially registered description/title.
borgs8472 wrote:just like you can't vote for Communism, Liberalism etc. I think.
hamish wrote:rancidpunk wrote:Am I alone in being only interested in what needs to be done to help pirates win elections wherever they are geographically located?
That's exactly why we're arguing for this! So that more people will vote for us! AGH.
hamish wrote:rancidpunk wrote:Am I alone in being only interested in what needs to be done to help pirates win elections wherever they are geographically located?
That's exactly why we're arguing for this! So that more people will vote for us! AGH.
rancidpunk wrote:hamish wrote:rancidpunk wrote:Am I alone in being only interested in what needs to be done to help pirates win elections wherever they are geographically located?
That's exactly why we're arguing for this! So that more people will vote for us! AGH.
I asked if someone could tell me exactly what needs to be changed in the PPUK Manifesto to make it compatible with Scottish law, not Scottish feelings. If it needs to be altered to comply then that's fine, but if it is to be changed just to make it different from the English one, then why bother?
Recently it has been suggested here that the Scots want/need/deserve a new manifesto, a new name and a Scottish party leader. Whether any of this is needed to win Scottish votes or just 'cos you want your independence is what's confusing me.
hamish wrote:
Well hopefully you'll just trust in us that it is to win votes. My impression none of the people arguing for a new manifesto (and Pirate Party Scotland btw, is NOT a new name, it was used in GE10) are even slightly interested in wanting party independence, quite the opposite, we're all strongly opposed.
As for what exactly needs to be changed, read the first post in this thread. When whoever's writing the manifesto actually sets to work then we'll find out what changes'll be made. That's something I too want to find out, and we can only find out once we get past bickering and start ACTUALLY WORKING.
Sorry, but you don't seem to have read any of the arguments thoroughly.
cc wrote:rancid, please don't be mad at them. The Scottish members are volunteering to modify the manifesto for the Scottish election, which is exactly the kind of thing we want to encourage. If they think they can come up with a manifesto that is better suited to either Scottish laws or Scottish feelings, that's decidedly A Good Thing™. And, if they come up with something that won't reflect well on the party, we can always stop them later!
rancidpunk wrote:hamish wrote:
Well hopefully you'll just trust in us that it is to win votes. My impression none of the people arguing for a new manifesto (and Pirate Party Scotland btw, is NOT a new name, it was used in GE10) are even slightly interested in wanting party independence, quite the opposite, we're all strongly opposed.
As for what exactly needs to be changed, read the first post in this thread. When whoever's writing the manifesto actually sets to work then we'll find out what changes'll be made. That's something I too want to find out, and we can only find out once we get past bickering and start ACTUALLY WORKING.
Sorry, but you don't seem to have read any of the arguments thoroughly.
I have read the first post and I've been asking for specifics, not generalisations. I would much rather be talking about proposed changes in the manifesto rather than about if there should be any. It's not that hard to write up a draft manifesto, so why start the debate before you've come up with something to debate?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests